On Boneheads and Literati

A danged lovely read.

Written by Joni Newman, guest essayist ~

A few years ago as an undergrad I took a literature class that very nearly sucked all the life out of me.  The class included a plethora of post-modern literature.  It meant a semester with authors like Cormac McCarthy and Toni Morrison – authors that other people (re: not me) found genius because of their innovative writing techniques and mystical storytelling.  It also included spending a huge amount of time with a professor who, while certainly very qualified in her field, drove me absolutely batty with her elitist views on literature.  The books that I was even tempted to enjoy were so destroyed by class discussion that I started a countdown to the end of class.

Now, for you to appreciate any of this, you must understand that my favorite thing in the entire world to do is to talk about what I’m reading.  As a student I was an overactive participant in every class discussion (including this professor’s.)  As a teacher in my own class, my primary method of inspiring life-long reading in my students revolves around discussion.  I still believe that talking about books is a fun and productive way for people to enter into the world conversation.  For a teacher to out-discuss a book to me takes a huge amount of work.  Somehow, by her focussing more on commentaries on the book rather than the book itself, I managed to leave her class every day with the mad desire to never touch another book again.

But then, at the end of the semester, we were assigned the book Mr. Pip by Lloyd Jones.  It was one of those “kindred spirit” reads that so resonated with me that I simply could not bring myself to write what I had been writing all term to please my professor.  Before, I had played the game and written exactly what I knew she would like.  It was the kind of high brow writing I could do well, but didn’t enjoy.  This time, this one last time, I wanted to write for myself just as I had read for myself.  So I presented a plan to my professor.  I reminded her that I had done spectacularly on all her other assignments and suggested that perhaps I could try a different style this time?  Specifically a personal essay instead?  My professor nodded, said that would be a fine idea, and I tripped off home to write.

I wrote about how the story of Mr. Pip had resonated so closely with my dearest reading experiences.  Those times when you read a book that takes you away to the point where, upon returning “home”, you feel as though you’ve left it and aren’t quite sure what to do with yourself.  I wrote particularly of my time with Anne of Green Gables, the dearest and most personal of my reading experiences.  I wrote about how, like the main character in Pip who had grown obsessed with Great Expectations, I felt closer to Anne than nearly any “real” person.  The resulting essay was a fairly sentimental tribute, perhaps, but I meant it.  Throughout my college experience I had enjoyed analyzing the symbolic and historical significance of great works of fiction very much, but this time I wanted to honor it.

Knowing that my professor was often rather forgetful and was likely to need some reminding that she had, in fact, approved my experiment, I included a cover page to my essay.  I thanked her for assigning the book and let her know how much I enjoyed it.  Then, feeling more than a little cheeky and daring and fed-up after a long semester, I included the following quote:

The elitists are such boneheads they think literature exists to be admired.  Wrong.  Literature exists to create memories so true and important that we allow them to become part of ourselves, shaping our future actions because we remember that once someone we admired did this, and someone we hated and feared did that.

Literature matters only to the degree that it shapes and changes human behavior by making the audience wish to be better because they read it.

It becomes importantly bad only to the degree that it entices the audience to revel in actions and memories that debase the culture that embraces it.

Next to that, questions of how one literary work influences other literary works, or how the manner of writing measures up to the tastes of some elite group are so trivial that you marvel that someone who went to college could ever think they mattered more.

(Orson Scott Card, July 29, 2007, “Uncle Orson Reviews Everything”)

This was, admittedly, a very foolish and risky thing to do.  My professor, after all, was a bonehead literary elitist.  But given the subject matter of Mr. Pip I figured that, in spite of the jab, she had to be fair enough to see that the quote was actually supporting the lesson taught by the book she’d assigned me to read.  If she had a soul at all – she had to see reason, right?


On the last day of class when my portfolio was returned, I pulled out my essay to see that it didn’t appear to even have been touched.  There was no crease by the staple, at least.  Only the cover page had any response to it.  Next to the quote by Orson Scott Card was written, “Not true.  This is a very silly remark.  See if you can figure out why?”

I left class that day absolutely fuming.  Even now, two years later and well out of this woman’s grasp, I still get frustrated thinking about it.  I hated her for being such an elitist that she’d forgotten why people should read to begin with.

If you ask people why they read, I would imagine that very few people would tell you that they enjoy reading because they enjoy high faluting literary commentaries.  That may be part of the reason.  This essay, after all, is a commentary on literature.  I don’t think literary analysis is bad at all – I think it’s what helps to keep a book alive and relevant.  But if you talk to most readers about their favorite books, the analysis will only matter to them if they have connected to the book individually as well.  If that book, as Card says, “shapes and changes human behavior by making the audience wish to be better because they read it.”

I’ve realized this even more now that I’m on the other side as a teacher myself.  For the past two years I have been the one to present students with books they will be forced to read and then graded on.  I’ve fought to make sure that I find books and plays that I love and have tried to pass that on to my students.  Because I teach a combined English and History class, I also try to find books that will make particular connections that can link to their immediate reality.  Studying To Kill a Mockingbird and Asian philosophy together, for example, provides a nice discussion on how to live your life in a way that is at peace with difficult decisions.  It is rewarding to have class discussions where students do what the state educational system wants them to do – demonstrate understanding of important themes and symbols in literature.  But the greatest compliment I receive as a teacher is something that could never be measured – it’s when I hear a student say they love a book I’ve assigned them to read.  To hear a class refer to Atticus Finch (To Kill a Mockingbird), Reuven Malter (The Chosen), Jonas (The Giver) or Napoleon (Animal Farm) as examples of people they do or don’t want to be like.  And these are all people (and a pig) who never technically walked the earth.

I remember being in second grade and coming to class every day with a pile of books as tall as I could carry.  I would read one chapter from the book on the top of the pile and then put that book on the bottom and take the next one down and so on to maximize the number of books I could read at a time.  I remember falling asleep with my mother’s copy of Anne of Green Gables when I was young, flipping through the pages long before I could read the words on them, aching to be old enough to read it.  I remember getting my drivers license and going to the library for my first drive alone.  I remember staying up until way past my bedtime reading books by flashlight.  I remember the first time I read Jane Eyre. I remember finishing Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows and immediately starting the book again because I wasn’t ready to say good-bye yet. The first piece of furniture I ever bought for myself was – what else? – a bookshelf.  I remember packing my emergency kit when I was young and agonizing over which book I loved most to save if I had no time to save them all.

That is why we read, isn’t it?  Because we want to fall in love.  Because stories matter.  They take us away, they bring us back, they touch our souls and enlighten our minds.  At their best, stories inspire us to be better than we could have been on our own steam.

I look across my bedroom and see Mr. Pip on one of my bookshelves now, situated in alphabetical order between The Turn of the Screw and Ella Enchanted, two completely different works of fiction.  One I read to work out my brain and for the pleasure of words perfectly formed, one I read for the pleasure of a simple story well told.  I wonder where Mr. Pip sits on the shelves of the office of this old professor of mine.  I wonder – hope, really – that she has a book that she reads every year just because she wouldn’t feel complete if she didn’t.  I hope, too, that she read a book this year not as a teacher preparing for students but as a human being that needs to be connected to other human beings – even if they are fictional.



image credit

9 thoughts on “On Boneheads and Literati

  1. I’ve been blessed with some good teachers in my life, who share your view on why we read. And then, I had a few of the boneheads as well, mostly in college. One of the greatest pleasures in teaching my own children has been the privilege of introducing books to them that they really connect with and love. My daughter has been known to cry when she reaches the end of a book, because she doesn’t want it to end.

  2. I’ve had one or two great teachers. One was my high school junior year – I’ll have to look up her name. One was Glade Hunsaker at BYU. I’ll throw in Richard Cracroft, too – except he believed in literature in a way that I never will. The rest of them had degrees and a job. We want good books for ourselves and our kids – I want to read well-handled language (which you don’t learn by rote) and stories that are truthful, but also hopeful. I don’t want to be preached at by either light or dark. And the dark, perhaps, preaches hardest of all, twisting the truth into unreal shapes and keeping us busy with shiny things – while all the time it lies to us, ultimately selling despair.

    But beyond that, I read for just the reasons Joni lists – it’s a social experience for me. I don’t read for the sake of deconstruction – that’s not my sport. And my privilege is the echo of yours – being able to choose great and wonderful books for my own children – books that will make them love life and its potential joys.

  3. I love to read for the art of expression others find and dare to share. What a gift a writer brings to light when they grant us a glimpse into their soul.
    With each stretch of my own personal discovery I find myself more able to connect to characters, phrases, and cleverly sculpted words that others paint across their black and white canvas. The power of words all teach, and yes, some are delivered from boneheads. 🙂 But, when a word or sentence graces a piece of paper or a story transforming into a magical moment, I am always grateful.
    Not all thoughts are equal in what they will deliver, but all thoughts can teach us and lead us to a discovery process for growth. In every story there is another waiting to be told.

    • In so much you say, I find agreement. I think that it’s not the writer we see as boneheaded so much as the people who spend their lives NOT writing, but inserting themselves between the writer and the reader – who would have the chutzpah to think they can define the meaning of a writer, and then test their captive audience and punish that audience when they think for themselves, or when they don’t see things the same way – as though a book has one and only one meaning – rather than understanding the truth of it – as you say – as each mind and soul comes to a sentence, that soul will find the meaning in it that fits the soul. The answers to that soul’s questions, or the questions that will lead the soul to the next place. Thank you so much for your comment.

  4. “At their best, stories inspire us to be better than we could have been on our own steam.”
    That’s why I read more often than not….
    I have been revolutionary, vegetarian, more Christian…kinder, gentler….better, because of stories that would not let me do otherwise.

    • Me, too. And I have learned to see more deeply. And to hesitate before I access people.

  5. Thanks for all your kind comments. It’s been nice to see the ways that all of you express in your own way what I did in my way.

  6. Very nice. I had an off experience with a professor just last night. Nothing to do with literature, but elitist, non the less. I can relate. Your essay makes me want to read something other than a text book — maybe pull out an old favorite.

    • You have to do it sometimes – just for sanity’s sake. When I’m really fried, I read L.M.Montgomery. Her pace is like swimming in cool water. And she laughs at the elite.